How We Lie to Ourselves
INFORMATION INPUT AND HOW WE DISTORT IT
I find that
general systems of logic work for most people. The problem, is that people seek
out information only to destroy it. I have seen this work in a several ways.
There are those people who see what they want to see. Then we have the people
who actively ignore evidence. Then there are the people who are willfully
ignorant, when we explain to them, what logical fallacies are and why they are
bad – no matter how easy it is to understand, we know the individual has the IQ
to get it – they actively choose not to get it.
Self-deception
has a psychological advantage. It makes the person feel good. Self-deception
occurs because we want to feel good, and deception can help us do that. At
first glance, we realize that self-deception has the great advantage of making
us feel warm and fuzzy inside. Sometimes, self-deception gives us feelings of
meaning and purpose, feelings that are otherwise missing in our lives.
Lying to
ourselves has costs, even when those costs are not immediately felt. When we
base conscience decisions on falsehoods, in many situations this can turn
around and bite us. We see the consequences when waging offensive, ridiculous
wars based upon the fact we deluded ourselves into thinking that country has
weapons of mass destruction and in cahoots with Bin Laden. It is seen more
often in romantic disasters – when we date a mentally ill/alcoholic/abusive
person, and delude ourselves into thinking that the person is really good deep
down. Time and again, alienating ourselves from reality has costs – huge costs.
Censoring Input
Humans commonly
seek out publications that mirror or support their prior views and largely
avoid those that don’t. If I see an article discussing befits of higher
education, you bet that I am going to read it. If I see a YouTube video from
some person talking about why they think it is a waste of time to get a Bachelor’s
degree, you bet I will ignore it. This is my bias working.
Some people
avoid taking an HIV test because they would rather not know. The person feels
happier and more secure being ignorant about their HIV status. We all know the
huge costs this carries for society.
Attending Input
When we do allow
input to enter our brains, we must wrestle with other cognitive biases.
Confirmation bias is the one I am most accustomed to experiencing in myself and
in others. People actively seek out, and focus their attention on things that
conform to their beliefs rather than negate their beliefs. This in itself has
nothing to do with deceit or deception.
Biased Memory
We more easily
remember positive information about ourselves than negative. It feels good –
doesn’t it. When I was twelve years old, my grandmother was complaining about
bad things other family members did to her. She boasted a story about how her
son-in-law commented that she was right about something. Grandma told that
story more times than I can remember. I turned to my grandmother, and asked a
question I should not have asked her, “Grandma, can you tell me a story when
you were wrong about something?” Let me just say – this did not end well.
People remember
their children being better, smarter and more talented than they actually were.
People remember themselves being smarter, better and more talented than they
really were. Examine the present, just go to YouTube and examine the comments.
It is amazing how many people think they are so wonderful, intelligent, and
most importantly – RIGHT. How many people really know themselves, or pay
attention to how often they are wrong about things?
Brokaw / Vidal Interview
Memories are not
photos, nor are they videos. Memories are degraded over time, enhanced by the
emotions that shape our words, words that shape our thoughts, memories are
easily degraded.
One can even reverse
exactly who is saying what to whom. Tom Brokaw, on NBC’s Today Show interviewed
Gore Vidal, insisting that Vidal answer questions about his bisexuality. Vidal
did not want to talk about bisexuality and wanted to talk about politics.
****************************
****************************
More on this topic coming soon!
XXXOOO
Naomi
More on this topic coming soon!
XXXOOO
Naomi
One thing that has been depressing me about the online atheist community for awhile now is this very input thing.
ReplyDeleteI have seen countless times where "freethinkers" have demanded evidence from people, yet didn't demand evidence for stances that supported their own personal views. When presented with actual evidence that conflicted with their views, they resorted to the same tactics as the people they typically demonize (theists for example).
On a totally separate note, I have also been thinking about how we are moving away from printed books and how easy it might be in the future for digital evidence to be altered. When evidence can be changed so easily from moment to moment, how do you determine what is true? I think our society is contracting a case of dementia.